Paper 4

The text, an extract of an article by the BBC World Service website highlighted some of the more important issues raised in the present and future status of English in an international context.

One of which was the showcase of the expansion in other languages around the world. We most clearly see this in the text which states, “...about 1.5 billion people around the world speak it- but fewer than 400 million have it as their first language.” This shows that the expanding circle of English is getting bigger. In this increasing bubble of language, eventually, it will pop. This is further supported in the article in the discussions of translations by the internet and computers around the world. This is an important issue in English’s longevity because, with more global enabling of translation and support for other languages to be used without disadvantages, English will die.

This global enabling includes the use of new technologies that can translate even easier than ever before. We see this in the author’s reflection of how this would be applicable to the article itself which is shown when they wrote, “...with a couple of clicks on your computer… you could just as easily be reading it [the article] in German or Japanese.” This outward thinking perspective is a great showcase of the translative technologies being a huge problem for the English language as it will soon just be translated and equally summated with all of the other languages in the world as they are understood as first languages.

Not only is translative technology an important component of the English language for the world, but also the technological developments around the world in generality. That is inclusive of the manufacturing of products in foreign countries like China, which, is the largest producer of the world in products with a notorious “Made in China” sticker on almost everything you order on a regular basis. This idea of the superiority of language development through production can be backed by the author of the article who wrote, “There are probably more people in China who speak English as a second language than there are Americans who speak it as their first.” This communicational requirement can be soon mediated by technology and replace all other forms of communication as it will be easier and quicker to communicate for both parties using translative technology.

This is becoming increasingly obvious when we consider the trends in the world and otherworldly activities besides raw communication. If we take perhaps what the author thought which was when people want to “...play the latest video games or listen to the latest popular music…” They must know the language to fully understand and grasp the content. So in trends outside of regular communication, people’s own expressions are limited by language. This means that if the English language doesn’t stay prominent and dominate the markets of gaming and music etc… Then English will die.

David Crystal’s ideas also bring light to other ideas like the power of global language. This is the prominence of English throughout historical events, most notably the industrial revolution. This further aligns with the idea that the development of technology and broadening bridges between linguistic communities and their differences is what continues to drive change. Despite the overwhelming power and popularity of English now, it is more likely than not that the language will change. Just like if you told someone from the 16th century or before then that Latin wouldn’t be the most prominent language they would have looked at you like you were crazy. However, with the current momentum and popularity of English right now, it will be a prolonged period of time before English falls out of touch with its dominance as a language.

 


Comments

  1. Hi John! To start, I think that you had a very great introduction to your response. Your briefly explain the article and what the question was specifically asking from you. You also include a basic, but relevant summary to explain the overall point of the text. In your third paragraph, I really like the way you included the author's use of an ‘outward thinking perspective’. You clearly explain this by mentioning how it is a ‘great showcase’ of the ‘translated technologies’ and how this could be a huge issue for the future of the English language.
    You mention twice that ‘English will die’. While this is a great possibility, I believe that you could have explained this much more when discussing the future of the English language. The question also asks for the present and future status of the English language, which I think you fulfilled well. I also think that you did a good job including the use of English in other countries and how technology is beneficial, but threatens the English language. You do this very well in your fourth paragraph.
    I think you did a great job including David Crystal’s ideas and how the ‘future alings…drive change.’ This allows you to show your wider range of knowledge. However, I think that you could’ve added more details to show your knowledge.
    For AO1, I think you had a clear understanding of the text when referring to meaning, context, and audience. 4 marks.
    For AO2, I would say that you had a clear expression and there were some grammatical errors but they did not impede communication. For the most part, your content was relevant. 4 marks.
    For AO4, I believe that you only showed a clear understanding of linguistic issues and concepts as you somewhat answered the question, but you did not include much evidence from your wider range of study. 5 marks.
    Total- 13 marks/25 marks

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Gatsby's Connection to the Epigraph